Page 1 of 2 12 LastLast
Results 1 to 10 of 15

Thread: AW Whitley anomalies

  1. #1
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Lincoln, England
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 348 Times in 318 Posts

    Default AW Whitley anomalies

    Can someone please help me decode an entry on the card for Whitley N1508, which can be seen at Pages 79/80 of:
    http://lancasterbombersinfo.ipage.co...9-N1528/0.html
    As can be seen the aircraft was SOC on 9.11.40, presumably as a result of some sort of incident.
    But what does the third entry on Page 79 say? (the one dated 18.9.40). Presumably this was as a result of the incident, whatever it was (ideas anyone?)
    Thanks,
    Andy

  2. #2
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    347
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Hi Andy

    Chris Ward's 4 Group book has N1508 KN-B possibly burnt out at Finningly on return from Bapume 6/7.6.40 SOC 9.11.40

    Chorley Losses 1939-40 second Ed has 6/7.6.40 unknown 77 Sqn Whitley with P/O AW Dunn---left Driffield 2040 for Bapume. Less than hour later near Finningly flare ignited inside aircraft. Crew baled out and Dunn landed burning aircraft at Finningly.

    P/O A W Dunn
    P/O C J D Montagu
    Sgt Lucas
    AC1 A L Kennedy
    AC2 Martin
    Last edited by PeterColwill; 1st July 2022 at 12:51.

  3. The Following User Says Thank You to PeterColwill For This Useful Post:

    Andy Marden (1st July 2022)

  4. #3
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bewdley, UK
    Posts
    3,066
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 164 Times in 138 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Not Dunn,

    F1180 has N1476 filed 5/6/40 and AIR81 released since publication of Chorley confirms F1180

    http://www.rafcommands.com/database/...php?uniq=N1476

    Ross
    The Intellectual Property contained in this message has been assigned specifically to this web site.
    Copyright Ross McNeill 2015 to 2023 - All rights reserved.

  5. #4
    Join Date
    Jul 2011
    Posts
    347
    Thanks
    0
    Thanked 6 Times in 6 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Thanks Ross,

    N1476 is said to have ditched off Hastings Pier two weeks later (20.6).........does this mean it was rapidly repaired or is the Hastings I/d suspect ?
    cheers Peter

  6. #5
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bewdley, UK
    Posts
    3,066
    Thanks
    2
    Thanked 164 Times in 138 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    For the 5th incident the F1180 does say landed ok and notes 4 crew ordered to bale out due to choking. Listed as Cat M but from the subsequent Air81 on 20th it suggests no obvious limiting structural damage and the aircraft was returned to ops.

    Ross
    The Intellectual Property contained in this message has been assigned specifically to this web site.
    Copyright Ross McNeill 2015 to 2023 - All rights reserved.

  7. #6
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Lincoln, England
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 348 Times in 318 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    The relevant Air-Britain serials books say:
    AD690 10 OTU Engine caught fire on approach; bellylanded in field 3m S of Stanton Harcourt, 4.7.44
    BD690 10 OTU Crashlanded after engine fire 3m S of Stanton Harcourt, 4.7.44; DBF
    A truly amazing coincidence!

    The AM78 for AD690 records it being issued to 10 MU on 1.10.42, Cat E1 4.7.44, SOC 16.7.44
    The AM78 for BD690 records it being issued to 10 MU (but with no date), Cat E (Burnt) 4.7.44, SOC 15.10.44

    The lack of an issue date for BD690 leaves me wondering if there was some sort of admin error in the records for this aircraft.
    Can anyone add anything further please? Does anyone have the relevant ORB copied (AIR29/639)? - it's not been digitalized.

  8. #7
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,246
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 46 Times in 44 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Hi Andy,

    Believe the third entry refers to SS Cars Ltd, not “Carrs”, whose wartime contribution appears on the page below “….majority of the wartime work related to aircraft. For SS Cars, this would predominantly be involved with the repair of Whitley bombers which were flight tested at nearby Tachbrook aerodrome. By 1945, the company had made aircraft wings, fuel tanks, tails and other components for Whitley bombers.”

    https://jec.org.uk/news/2020/jaguar-ww2

    Robert
    Last edited by robstitt; 7th June 2023 at 18:13. Reason: Typo. Carrs ref added

  9. #8
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Bristol, England
    Posts
    1,534
    Thanks
    44
    Thanked 83 Times in 75 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Andy

    My note against AD690:

    "Chorley advises that when the paperwork was prepared advising various authorities of the crash of AD690, the serial BD690 was entered, thus both a/c came to be w/o on the same date."

    DaveW

  10. #9
    Join Date
    Nov 2020
    Location
    Lincoln, England
    Posts
    913
    Thanks
    16
    Thanked 348 Times in 318 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Thanks both.
    It does seem quite likely that there was confusion over the identity of this loss.
    That said, I would appreciate any confirmation from the 10 OTU ORB if anyone has it, or indeed details from relevant F1180.

  11. #10
    Join Date
    Nov 2007
    Location
    Vancouver Island, British Columbia, Canada
    Posts
    1,246
    Thanks
    3
    Thanked 46 Times in 44 Posts

    Default Re: AW Whitley anomalies

    Hi Andy,

    Would you deduce that SS Cars Ltd as a CRO was tasked to look at N1508 and the decision then made to write it off?

    Robert

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •